Let’s give a hand to Volkman–a little thank you can go a long way

Byldoadmin

Dear Dr. David Volkman:

I want to thank you for your submission to the IDSA panel.  For many years scientists have been silenced in this debate.  It is a bit astonishing what happens when one group has unfettered power and the ability to put the lid on careers.

What it takes to blow that lid off is steadfast honesty in the face of opposition.  I have been working on the IDSA antitrust action for three years.  It is my passion project.  My hope was to create a space where an honest scientist with courage could walk into the room and dispel the myth that the science on Lyme disease is a closed book.

You are the man who walked into the room and spoke truth to power. 

Thank you.

Lorraine Johnson, JD, MBA

 

To read the original post on Volkman and his submission to the IDSA click here.   YOU CAN SEND YOUR OWN THANK YOU TO:  volkmans@optonline.net

Similar Posts

  • GIVING THANKS

    Last Thursday, the historic review of the IDSA 2006 Lyme guidelines was held in Washington, D.C. Eighteen people presented arguments for and against the guidelines. We don’t know how the IDSA panel will act in the face of this deluge of previously suppressed information, but we do know that we have grown enormously as a community and that the skill-sets we developed on this project will continue to have a positive effect in the future.

    I want to share with you a little of the background of the action and acknowledge people who have joined in this massive undertaking over this period. Many others have contributed, and I apologize if I have overlooked anyone’s contribution to this effort.

  • LYMEPOLICYWONK: HAPPY NEW YEARS CHANGE MAKERS!

    I wanted to post a piece of poetry that captured the spirit of the Lyme community to ring in the New Year. I found this great Jack Kerouac poem about people who create change. Then I found out it was not by Jack Kerouac, but actually was an ad for Apple computers. Still, it is a great piece that captures the essence of a community that tirelessly swims against the current trying to change the status quo. And now for that poem. . .

  • LYMEPOLICYWONK: Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus: Virginia Lyme Task Force Findings Released

    There is a lot to like about the Virginia Governor’s Task Force on Lyme Disease findings, which were unanimously adopted on June 30th after a number of public hearings. The report totals 19 pages and it is remarkably balanced. Congratulations to all involved! I want to share with you what I like about the report by highlighting key points from the findings on Diagnosis, Treatment, Public Education and Prevention, and Children.

  • Lyme Policy Wonk: Fresh back from the conferences!

    Fresh back from the Columbia/LDA conference and the ILADS conference in Washington, DC. I love going back for these conferences because I see all the people I have talked to over the year and so rarely lay eyes on. I love the energy of the conference. This year, the ILADS conference had break-out sessions on evidence-based medicine and research. These were working groups with a lot of discussion generated—the type of discussion that only occurs when people are together in the same room and real time conversation occurs sparked by ideas. This was energizing to me.

  • LYMEPOLICYWONK: IOM Report: ’Tis neither here nor there. Or?

    The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has released its long awaited report on Lyme disease. So should we celebrate or despair? I think there is room for a little of both. We should certainly celebrate the tone of the report, which characterizes the session as “a walk in the woods” to start dialogue and we should celebrate the contributions made by those who attended and participated, whether as patients, advocacy groups, researchers or physicians. I think these people did their very best to represent a side of Lyme disease that is not often given public voice. We should also recognize the contribution to a better process that was achieved by the three groups who pulled out of the hearing (CALDA, LDA, and Time for Lyme). This action resulted in Dr. Benjamin Luft of Stony Brook University being added to the agenda and may have also added to the “tone” of the report. What we should not lose sight of though, is that a civil tone and the inclusion of some patients’ testimony are not enough. This is a debate about science. Debates are about equal time, opportunities to rebut, and not excluding opposing viewpoints. That did not happen here. And, what the IOM left out or left unchallenged harms patients. Our biggest hits were in diagnosis, the exclusion of the topics chronic Lyme and treatment, and the complete exclusion of any physicians from ILADS. Let me drill down into the details.