Author | LymeDisease.org
When we started publicizing that the 2010 CALDA Lymewalks are raising money for research, many people asked us what kind of research we are funding. It’s a fair question. Here’s a run-down on current research projects funded by CALDA.
Fiber artist/Lyme advocate Nani Lauriano Luculescu takes a CALDA T-shirt and turns it into a stunning piece of wearable art.
On July 8th, police in Ocala, Florida, made a shocking discovery in a travel trailer at the side of a highway–the bodies of 48-year-old George Strobos and his 49-year-old wife Jonalyn. It turns out the couple, both suffering from advanced Lyme disease, had taken their own lives. Last night, their son, Michael Strobo, of Austin, Texas, made a series of heartfelt postings about his parents on the CALDA Facebook page. Michael subsequently gave me permission to re-post his writings here.
What are we to make of the recently launched journal “Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases” that includes on its editorial board five members of the IDSA Lyme guidelines panel? Dr. Wormser, who chaired the IDSA Lyme guidelines panel, is an associate editor of the journal. Do you think that they might have a bias or might exclude others points of view? If so, is this peer review or is it censorship?
Some people don’t think that evidence-based medicine is about evidence. They think it is about power and ownership. I was a bit stunned to read Cerar et al (coauthor Dr. Wormser) take on the author of a meta-analysis on Lyme disease by boldly declaring that her conclusion was “not evidence based.” Kind of makes you wonder whether evidence is in the eye of the beholder and whether Cerar and Wormser have authority to settle scientific debates by proclamation of what constitutes “evidence”. Much as a scornful Humpty Dumpty did in Alice in Wonderland: "When I use a word. . ., 'it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." Does scientific debate really boil down to WHO says and how LOUDLY they say it? Should it? More after the jump.
Does history repeat itself? Did you know that the initial CDC definition of AIDS did not include women? And, because it did not include them, women were not included in research and they were denied disability payments. So much for disease definitions just being about “surveillance”. It took them 4 years to change the definition and there were a lot of government hearings. Turns out the hearings were just for “show and tell”. Not real hearings intended to accomplish real things. Kind of reminds me of the IOM hearings going on right now. Here’s an interview from Maxine Wolfe in 2004 at ACT UP describing the scene. Let me know if you see any parallels here. I sure hope I don’t.
CALDA and Time for Lyme (TFL) want to thank everyone for their help on the petition asking Connecticut Attorney General Blumenthal to further hold the IDSA accountable. Although the petitions were limited to Connecticut residents and the timing fell in the midst of school graduations with all of the time those entail, approximately 2,500 signatures were collected and are being sent to him.
What do Representatives Chris Smith and Frank Wolf have in common? They know how to ask the right people hard questions. What do the IDSA, the NIH, and the IOM have in common? They’ve honed the skill of the artful dodger. Representatives Smith and Wolf want to know why the NIH “stepped back” from its charge to run a state of the science conference and handed that hot potato to the IOM. One big difference between the NIH process and the IOM process? The NIH process considers bias a conflict of interest, meaning IDSA folks wouldn’t be sitting on an NIH panel. But, drum roll. . .the IOM permits panels to be biased and coincidentally has a panel that consists almost exclusively of IDSA folks, 4 of 6 panel members. Oh, and one more thing, the IOM is not technically considered to actually be ‘the government’. This is a picture perfect example of plausible deniability. The NIH didn’t stack a panel. The IOM did with IDSA folks. But, hey, they like bias and they are not accountable, are they? A copy of the letter from Representatives Smith and Wolf to Dr. Francis Collins of the NIH together with Collins response can be downloaded at the bottom of this blog post.
When the eight-year-old boy bent his head down, his mother noticed an odd little bump under his hair. Looking more closely, she saw it was a tick. “We live near wetlands,” she explained to me. “We pull ticks off our dog all the time. No big deal.” She plucked out the tick with tweezers, threw it away and forgot about it.
Just last week, southern California Lyme patient Meredith Hiney heard about the upcoming 2010 CALDA Lymewalks, and “instantly knew” that raising money for Lyme disease research was something she wanted to do. Following the easy directions on the CALDA website, she set up her own fundraising page, emailed the link to family and friends, and in less than a week raised more than $1500 for Lyme research. Who is Meredith Hiney, and why is she fundraising like the energizer bunny?
End of content
End of content
